In The Press

Show all articles

Nashua Telegraph Says Other States Get Much More Stimulus Money than NH According to STEWARD Study

Other states fare better, study finds

CONCORD – New Hampshire finishes in the bottom 10 in the country and lowest in the Northeast for federal money per person coming from the $87 billion stimulus package, according to a report.

All other New England states rank in the top 20 while New Hampshire is 40th, according to Brian Gottlob with PolEcon Research of Dover.

From the six largest grant programs under the stimulus, New Hampshire will receive $818 million or about $620 per person, the study concluded.

The study was done for a Nashua investor who created a stimulus watchdog group.

Vermont ($1,016), Rhode Island ($911), Massachusetts ($885) and Maine ($836) all rank in the top 10. The closest state to New Hampshire with a smaller per-person grant is Virginia ($556).

Alaska ($1,099) leads the nation, while the smallest per-person grant state is Utah ($491), the study found.

Several federal programs set a minimum that all states must receive.

The eight states with fewer residents than New Hampshire all get more grant money per person than New Hampshire will and ranked in the top 20 in the U.S. according to the report.

Fred Tausch paid for the 26-page report through the anti-stimulus group he founded in February: Save The Economy Without Accumulating Record Debt.

"You would have thought our representatives would have gotten the state our fair share," Tausch said during an interview Monday.

The study acknowledged New Hampshire gets less because the grant dollars are based largely on existing federal programs not kind to states like this one with relatively low unemployment and low percentages of families without health insurance or those living in poverty.

"States with more income, lower unemployment and fewer social problems generally pay more and receive fewer resources from the federal government," Gottlob wrote.

A spokesman for U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen said on balance, the stimulus was well worth the investment.

"The Recovery and Reinvestment Act will create jobs and help get our economy back on track by investing in New Hampshire's roads, highways and bridges; by providing tax relief for middle class families and small businesses; and by making investments in clean energy and energy efficiency," Alex Reese said.

"This one piece of legislation alone won't solve all our economic challenges, but it will lay the foundation for economic recovery in New Hampshire and across the nation."

The state-by-state comparison in the report did not include the impact of $564 million in tax breaks being given to individuals over three years to residents here or smaller and still emerging grant programs that can't be broken down yet, Gottlob said.

All told, the state will receive about $1.5 billion from the stimulus, $920 million in all federal spending in the state and the tax cuts, he said.

The study also reports less than a third of stimulus money will stimulate the economy through increased government purchases of goods and services and up to $500 million is being used to supplant the state's share of spending.

"While this will ease some of the fiscal pressures facing state and local government, it will have little or no job creation impact although it may prevent some job cuts," Gottlob wrote.

"Further, it is questionable whether it would even be desirable to stimulate job creation in two sectors of the economy, public education and health care, that have experienced among the fasted job growth over the past decade."

Tausch voted for and contributed to President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign but the federal stimulus package moved him to create STEWARD. This week he hired as an executive director for the group Erin Abell, who worked on U.S. Sen. John McCain's 2008 campaign in New Hampshire before the primary and in Virginia for the general election.

Tausch claimed to have no ambition to use this as a springboard to seek political office in the future.

"The ongoing goal will be research and information that will allow people to make an informed decision," Tausch said.

The report questions the claims of others about how many jobs the federal stimulus will create.

Economists in the Obama administration conclude it will add 16,000 jobs in the state by the fourth quarter of 2010. Moody's estimates the impact here will be 20,000 jobs in 2010.

Gottlob said all he could predict for sure was 1,205 construction jobs would be created over the next three years and the individual tax breaks should support another 1,500 to 2,300 jobs in the state.

"The job impacts of specific spending proposals can be estimated for New Hampshire, but there are still too many unknowns and possible, unintended consequences to accurately forecast the total expected job creation of the plan in New Hampshire," Gottlob said.

It also notes the federal tax rebate checks sent by the Bush administration and Congress in 2008 totaling $468 million for New Hampshire were 82 percent of what this package sends back in tax breaks to state residents over a three-year period.

New Hampshire near the bottom

The following is a comparison of how New England and Northeast states fare in federal aid per person under the $87 billion stimulus package according to the report of Dover economist Brian Gottlob for Nashua investor Fred Tausch who used his own money to form a watchdog group known as Save The Economy Without Accumulating Record Debt.

The spending analyzed here was for the six federal grants given
to government and private concerns in education, transportation, Medicaid, energy, housing and the environment. All told, those programs will give New Hampshire $818 million.

The study concludes New Hampshire will get another $102 million in federal grants that aren’t yet comparable state by state. This analysis also does not include the impact of $564 million in tax cuts given to individuals in the stimulus package.



Join our Social Networks

© 2010     site by wedu
Paid for by Fred Tausch, Merrimack, NH